6 Comments

Great work!

I am doing a study in this line. I am a Neuroscientist.

Thank you for sharing your knowledge and wisdom and wishing you the best!

Kind regards

Expand full comment

A fun article.

Re: Strokes per character. I would expect the number of strokes in a character to correlate with the frequency of use of the character, i.e., more frequently used characters having fewer strokes.

Expand full comment
author

Oh yes, that makes much more sense than what I said. I only have access to the overall average though so I can’t check that

Expand full comment

Thinking about it more, word frequency will have a big impact for alphabetic languages and some impact for non-logogram languages.

Lots of sites list language letter frequencies.

Detailed English word frequency data https://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/bncfreq/

Non-English corpora https://web.archive.org/web/20060207144812/http://devoted.to/corpora

Expand full comment
author

Looking at the English alphabet though, I note that the character complexity in terms of my own writing speed doesn’t really vary that much at all. I wonder if it would apply to logographic languages better, where more strokes/character are required.

Expand full comment

Existing letter forms were driven by the incentive structures of times long gone. The desire for greater speed strikes me as a recent requirement, not that I know anything about the subject.

As I understand it, in times gone by, logographic writing was considered an art form. More strokes would provide greater opportunity to show one's skill.

Expand full comment